Jump to content



Featured Articles

Check out the latest featured articles.

File Library

Check out the latest downloads available in the File Library.

New Article

Product Viscosity vs. Shear

Featured File

Vertical Tank Selection

New Blog Entry

Low Flow in Pipes- posted in Ankur's blog

Htfs Tasc


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
2 replies to this topic
Share this topic:
| More

#1 wojtar

wojtar

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 83 posts

Posted 30 March 2010 - 10:37 AM

Hi everybody,

Could anyone tell me what should I specify in TASC "outlet piping element" under thermosiphon piping?
I've got vertical thermosiphon - 508 mm outside diameter. I specified inlet piping, arc bends etc. The problem appears when I come to "outlet piping elements". I've got just horizontal pipe without any bends connected to column bottom. I specified only dimeter and lenght of this pipe -> TASK warns me that: "The height 700 mm of the vapor return to column above the top of the tubes or shell appears to be inconsistent with the sum 0mm of the vertical lenghts of outlet piping. Please check the Thermosiphon input data carefully".
Am I forced to use any vertical pipes at the outlet? I don't want to use them!

#2 jcazenave

jcazenave

    Veteran Member

  • Members
  • 44 posts

Posted 08 April 2010 - 08:49 AM

You don't need to specify any vertical piping.
QTASC7 in the example directory doesn't have any. (this is a thermosyphon example)

I wonder if the different heights (liquid, return, etc.) are consistent.

I suspect the best solution is to contact Aspen Support or upload the case here.

Kind Regards

#3 wojtar

wojtar

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 83 posts

Posted 09 April 2010 - 09:45 AM

You don't need to specify any vertical piping.
QTASC7 in the example directory doesn't have any. (this is a thermosyphon example)

I wonder if the different heights (liquid, return, etc.) are consistent.

I suspect the best solution is to contact Aspen Support or upload the case here.

Kind Regards

;) Thanks. I've already sent a request to AspenTech for upgrade to version 7.2 -> solves everything...By the way they said that it's a "minor bug" in version 2006.

Edited by wojtar, 09 April 2010 - 09:47 AM.





Similar Topics