|

Cv Of Two Phase Flow
#1
Posted 19 July 2010 - 12:29 AM
#2
Posted 19 July 2010 - 12:38 AM
#3
Posted 19 July 2010 - 02:25 AM
The valve Cv is an inherent characteristic of any particular valve, and it does not change regardles of what type or phase of fluid is passing through it. I believe you are interested in estimating the total two-phase flow through a valve with given Cv?
Yes, that will help .
#4
Posted 19 July 2010 - 05:00 AM
I would be interested to hear if someone has an idea how the actual two-phase flow can be calculated through the valve with known Cv.
#5
Posted 19 July 2010 - 06:05 AM
I would be interested to hear if someone has an idea how the actual two-phase flow can be calculated through the valve with known Cv.
Hi there,
I 've got a HP magazine article dealing with these issues. Time to pick it home, scan it and i will download it asap.
Edited by sheiko, 20 July 2010 - 05:08 AM.
#6
Posted 19 July 2010 - 11:07 AM
I think it is still the old method of calculating Cv considering vapour alone and then considering liquid alone. Control valve Cv for two-phase would be sum of Cv values for liquid and vapour.
Warren controls "Valve sizing and selection technical reference" available online gives the formula.
Regards,
Sachin
#7
Posted 20 July 2010 - 05:06 AM
Attached Files
Edited by sheiko, 20 July 2010 - 05:07 AM.
#8
Posted 20 July 2010 - 06:38 AM
Dear Sheiko-See attached FYI
Indeed, this is avery good article. Thanks for it.
However, I am unable to forsee situation wherein control valve is required to install in line carrying two phase flow.
In general, I have followed philosophy of installing a control valve so that two phase can occur only at control valve downstream, if two phase is unavoidable.
Especially in steam service, I have never dealt with such situation where control valve is required to put in two phase. As I understand, there are two ways of installing control valve in steam system. 1) Install control valve in steam inlet line to consumer. 2) Install a control valve in condensate line after having steam, condensate separation in condensate drum (This is a typical arrangement wherein sufficient size steam trap is not available). No one can expect that two phase is coming out of consumer consuming steam.
Please indicate the situation wherein installation of control valve in two phase is unavoidable.
Otherwise, my recomendation is to avoid such situation by installing control valve at appropriate elevation.
Regards,
#9
Posted 20 July 2010 - 12:24 PM
It can not be pressure, level and flow control valve, but can be a temperature control valve. I have seen one such case in which flashing occured across a level control valve and there was another temperature control valve in downstream circuit. Temperature control valve had two phase flow entering it (hydroprocessing plant V-L separator outlet to stripper system).
Regards,
Sachin
#10
Posted 20 July 2010 - 01:10 PM
I am still of opinion that controlling two-phase flow is impossible in real systems, simply because of high influence of hydraulics (liquid holdup, flow regime) on control valve performance and actual flow (and that was the original question - estimating phase flows through a valve with known Cv) of both liquid and vapor/gas phases through the valve. The same valve, with same characteristics, and with the same % opening will pass different quantities of gas and liquid in all cases, for different flow regimes, which change as the total mass flow through the piping changes.
#11
Posted 20 July 2010 - 04:41 PM
I totally concur with this viewpoint and would further state that measuring two phase flow is darn near impossible. Even if it were (or is according to some vendors) possible, it is difficult and expensive.I am still of opinion that controlling two-phase flow is impossible in real systems
#12
Posted 31 July 2010 - 03:09 AM
Sachim reports an example of TCV on a two phase (apparently condensate) flow. More orthodox practice would be to install a flash tank after the first LCV (but flash steam might be lost to atmosphere) and direct the condensate to the TCV downstream. Yet flashing would also occur downstream of TCV, sacrificing some precision. Original case of no flash tank could be acceptable, since this TCV would try to "correct" heater fluid temperature irrespectively of two face condensate flow pattern. Sometimes control need not be as precise as possible, and a control valve can be better than nothing.
However it seems that the original example of LCV - TCV has a disadvantage, that the two controls can be conflicting: Which controls condensate flow, upstream level or downstream temperature? This issue is alleviated by the flash tank, especially if its holdup time is big.
In brief, control valves can be exceptionally used for two phase flows; design needs more caution in this case and control is not expected to be as precise as in single phase.
For instance, the original case of this thread refers to 20% steam & 80% water by weight; which means that actually steam controls the flow, having much bigger volume. So CV can be determined as above for the control valve. But above assumes more or less homogeneous flow (e.g. not slug or annular or stratified). This can be "helped" by constructing proper upstream fittings / arrangement.
Similar Topics
Heat Exchanger Steam FlowStarted by Guest_aliebrahem17_* , 25 Nov 2024 |
|
![]() |
||
![]() Flow Through Normally No Flow LineStarted by Guest_iippure_* , 08 Apr 2025 |
|
![]() |
||
![]() Flare Header Reverse FlowStarted by Guest_Ahmadhamzahperta_* , 04 Apr 2025 |
|
![]() |
||
![]() Dynamic Simulation After Feed Flow ReductionStarted by Guest_Kakashi-01_* , 20 Mar 2025 |
|
![]() |
||
Smr Reformer Flue Gas FlowStarted by Guest_kaidlut_* , 14 Feb 2025 |
|
![]() |