Edited by USR, 21 February 2011 - 11:57 PM.
|

Lp Condensate Flash Vessel
#1
Posted 21 February 2011 - 09:21 PM
#2
Posted 03 March 2011 - 02:10 PM
Attached Files
#3
Posted 06 March 2011 - 08:02 AM
Edited by fallah, 06 March 2011 - 08:03 AM.
#4
Posted 06 March 2011 - 10:02 AM
The submitted drawing shows a Pressure Controller regulating a control valve on the (steam?) condensate inlet line. [In Chemical Engineering we deal with a lot of different "condensates" and I think we should try to be specific in at least that detail.] Steam condensate is formed by condensing a utility steam supply on heating demand or by a power generation system such as a steam turbine. Either way, ALL steam condensate formed in a process plant is collected and sent back to it boiler origin to complete the Rankine cycle. That means that LEVEL CONTROLLERS are used to monitor the creation of the condensate and used to regulate its transport to a convenient collection system for ultimate return to a boiler. A Pressure Controller is not the correct instrument for this application.
A Resistance Orifice (RO) is certainly not a correct device to use for this application either. Not only is not an instrument, it is a latent safety hazard in the steam condensation application I've just described. The RO CANNOT CONTROL and ensure that a safe and required condensate seal always exists upstream of it. That means that when all the condensate flows through the RO, a steam BLOW-THROUGH event will be generated, sending high pressure steam downstream to a low-pressure designed system. This certainly is not something to recommend for this application - unless further detailed and accurate basic data is furnished. But since USR is not being explicit, no recommendation can be given.
#5
Posted 07 March 2011 - 07:27 AM
A Resistance Orifice (RO) is certainly not a correct device to use for this application either. Not only is not an instrument, it is a latent safety hazard in the steam condensation application I've just described. The RO CANNOT CONTROL and ensure that a safe and required condensate seal always exists upstream of it. That means that when all the condensate flows through the RO, a steam BLOW-THROUGH event will be generated, sending high pressure steam downstream to a low-pressure designed system. This certainly is not something to recommend for this application - unless further detailed and accurate basic data is furnished. But since USR is not being explicit, no recommendation can be given.
Above mentioned statements are generally right regarding RO usage in condensate lines.But i think in the sketch under discussion the condensate collector has certainly been fed through some LV or steam traps in upstream.Thus in this system steam BLOW-THROUGH could be a hazard firstly across LV or steam trap rather than RO.
Anyway,IMO a proper sized RO could be installed right at the inlet of flash drum to avoid flashing in the condensate collector provided that proper material would be considered its downstream against erosion due to two phase flow created by flashing.
Similar Topics
Batch Adsorption: H/d Ratio For Vessel SizingStarted by Guest_Victor_process_Engineer_* , 28 Feb 2025 |
|
![]() |
||
How To Remove The Condensate In A Wet Gas StreamStarted by Guest_ksagarzazu_* , 25 Feb 2025 |
|
![]() |
||
Off Spec Condensate Storage TankStarted by Guest_shekhar dhuri_* , 05 Sep 2013 |
|
![]()
|
||
Kerosene Flash Point TroubleshootingStarted by Guest_zuberattan_* , 25 Oct 2009 |
|
![]()
|
||
![]() Flash Seperation For N-Butane IsomerizationStarted by Guest_CHEMICAL_LOVER_* , 04 Dec 2024 |
|
![]() |