Jump to content



Featured Articles

Check out the latest featured articles.

File Library

Check out the latest downloads available in the File Library.

New Article

Product Viscosity vs. Shear

Featured File

Vertical Tank Selection

New Blog Entry

Low Flow in Pipes- posted in Ankur's blog

Helix Exchanger


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
6 replies to this topic
Share this topic:
| More

#1 Guest_Guest_Mani_*

Guest_Guest_Mani_*
  • guestGuests

Posted 28 June 2005 - 04:44 AM

In Butadiene Plant We have three condensers at Final column overhead, namely 11-522 A, B and C. From final column we get Butadiene product
Out of the three, two remains in line and third one kept as standby.
The popcorn incidence in 11-522B occurred
Furthermore, if penetration of cooling water to shell side
occured prior popcorn formation, the oxygen content in the cooling water
might have been a cause.To avoid this can we go for Helix Exchanger

I am not aware of advantage of a Helix exchanger for vapour condensing on shell side.
Does it reduce stagnant zones as compared to normal S&T baffled exchanger?
Do baffles play any part in an exchanger with vapour condensing on shell side?

#2 Art Montemayor

Art Montemayor

    Gold Member

  • Admin
  • 5,782 posts

Posted 28 June 2005 - 06:27 PM

Mani:

What is "Popcorn" incidence? I suspect you're trying to say you've experience severe corrosion on the shell of your TEMA-type condensers. Is that true?

What is a "Helix Exchanger"? Is it a Spiral heat exchanger - such as the type fabricated by Alfa Laval? If so, then I can confirm that you'll have much reduced stagnant zones in the Spiral model. In fact, this is why this type of exchanger is so efficient. There is no shell side or tube side in a conventional Spiral unit.

Until you identify the cause of your condenser failure, I wouldn't make a general guess on whether changing the type or model of condenser would resolve your problem or not. Your problem may be resolved by a simple material of construction change - but who's to know if you haven't identified the culprit?

More information is certainly needed before making any concrete and intelligent comments.

Art Montemayor

#3 gvdlans

gvdlans

    Gold Member

  • ChE Plus Subscriber
  • 619 posts

Posted 29 June 2005 - 01:11 PM

My guess is that Mani means a Helixchanger, as made by ABB Lummus Heat Transfer, see http://www.lummusonl...anger/index.htm

A Helixchanger does reduce stagnant zones as compared to normal S&T baffled exchanger. It is often possible to convert a conventional S&T exchanger into a Helixchanger.
I suggest you contact ABB LHT directly to ask whether the Helixchanger offers any advantages in your specific case. You can contact them via the above mentioned website.

#4 Art Montemayor

Art Montemayor

    Gold Member

  • Admin
  • 5,782 posts

Posted 29 June 2005 - 02:27 PM

Guido:

I agree with your thinking. Mani is obviously looking at an efficient design of a Lummus Helixchanger. If Mani is reading this, I would note the following for his interest:

1. The Helixchanger is a proprietary design; only Lummus ABB has total control on the special design and rating relationships surrounding this type of heat exchanger. This is a CLOSED ARCHITECTURE type of technology - sort of like an Apple computer. The user has no knowledge or has no capability of obtaining the design and fabrication criteria and know-how. The user is subject to 100% control of the know-how being in the hands of Lummus ABB. This is a very touchy and controversial subject. Any repairs, modifications, or ratings are controlled and done solely by Lummus ABB - no one else has the capability to do this. Therefore, the prices and timing for doing these things are all controlled by Lummus ABB. You cannot rate or calculate this exchanger using the standard algorithms used in HTRI and other software.

2. The possibility of this configuration being efficiently applicable to a vapor condensing duty is subject to the owner's (Lummus) answering all these questions. I kinda doubt it, but I could certainly be wrong since I know little or nothing of the total technology employed.

3. Any conventional maintainance and repairs are certainly going to be subject to Lummus being involved in some way or other -- this is another cost item that isn't discussed for obvious reasons.

4. The design certainly stands to be more efficient than conventional TEMA type exchangers. However, note that the baffle design is very special and the technique to design and fabricate them is very special as well. The mechanical fabrication setup to cut, shape, and drill these baffles is going to involve some tooling-up that possible can't be handled on a local basis. Again, this is one of the hidden prices (or trade-offs) you have to pay when you "lock-in" into a proprietary design that is "closed" to everyone except the designer-fabricator.

I like the design; it is obvious that it avoids many failings in the shell side design of conventional heat exchangers. I don't believe I could justify its application in many instances because of the "closed architecture". In other words, I couldn't go out for competitive bids on maintenance or repairs - or replacement - in the future. I would be totally under the control of what Lummus ABB would charge at that specific time in history - something that many plant owners won't tolerate.

Art Montemayor

#5 Guest_Bert Boxma_*

Guest_Bert Boxma_*
  • guestGuests

Posted 30 June 2005 - 03:50 AM

I've been made aware of this forum discussion by Guido.
My name is Bert Boxma, Business Development Manager at ABB Lummus Heat Transfer B.V. working now 7 years in this Helixchanger business.
Please be informed that the fouling type mentioned is solved at DOW by using Helixchanger. HTRI and ESDU have developed calculation engines including simulation software with helical baffles. There are more than 40 Licensees-fabricators who can offer Helixchanger on a competative basis.
Up to now more than 1000 units are in operation.
If you like to know more, please use google and search for Helixchanger
or Bert Boxma. Thank you for your attention.
Bert

#6 Guest_kipa_*

Guest_kipa_*
  • guestGuests

Posted 04 July 2005 - 04:40 AM

Mani
For my knowledge can you pl. brief "popcorn" incidence

#7

  • guestGuests
  • 0 posts

Posted 08 August 2005 - 02:09 AM

Mani, Gents,

Perhaps there is an alternative for you to consider.

Shell Global Solutions has developed new shell & tube heat exchanger technology called EMbaffle Technology. By using expanded metal to replace the normally used plate in conventional technology several benefits can be achieved (shell-side):

- Low pressure drop,
- Increased thermal performance,
- Significant weight reduction
- Uniform velocity & flow in the shell,
- No tube vibration,
- No stagnant zones,
- Can be calculated in HTRI ver. 4.0 +SP1, commercially available software,
- Commercially competitive with conventional technology, in larger exchangers and exchangers with high alloy materials it is significantly cheaper.

If your interested to learn more about this technology please feel free to contact me on George.G.Anderson@shell.com.




Similar Topics