the thermal oxisder operates at 1100c and the flame arrestor is made of 316 stainless steel see the attached picture
|

Melted Flame Arrestor
Started by Guest_Laurence Parr_*, Nov 03 2005 07:49 AM
4 replies to this topic
Share this topic:
#1
Guest_Laurence Parr_*
Posted 03 November 2005 - 07:49 AM
we have a flame arrestor on a waste gas steam from process which is fed into an thermal oxidiser. this flame aresstor has totaly melted. has anyone seen anything like this before or could offer some reason as to how this has happened.
the thermal oxisder operates at 1100c and the flame arrestor is made of 316 stainless steel see the attached picture
the thermal oxisder operates at 1100c and the flame arrestor is made of 316 stainless steel see the attached picture
#2
Posted 08 November 2005 - 10:03 AM
Very interesting. Sorry, I've never seen anything like it. I would confirm the materials of construction since 316 stainless is a good choice for moderately high temperatures. If the MOC is OK, then the temperature in the flame arrestor apparently got much hotter than expected. It would be interesting to postulate how that could happen. Good Luck, Doug
#3
Posted 10 November 2005 - 07:32 PM

You have 1100C which is 2012F. This is near the temperature one would use for hot forging. Melting point is about 2600F (about 1410C).
I don't believe that you should operate such a device at these temperatures. What is the manufacturer's rating?
PAUL
#4
Posted 11 November 2005 - 08:54 AM
Paul,
While I agree with your statements regarding 316SS and its ability to withstand temperature effects, I think you or I have misinterpreted the situation. I took the description to mean that the combustion zone of the thermal oxidizer operated at the specified temperature. I picture the flame arrestor being in the waste (which I assume to be like a fuel) line. It should not experience the maximum temperatures, but should be essentially cooled by a flow of waste gases across it. Perhaps infrequently there could be a tendency for the combustion zone to flash back towards the waste gas source, and the flame arrestor would serve its function at those times. Thus it should operate at much lower temperatures than those of the combustion zone. Let me know if you think I've misinterpreted the situation.
Thanks,
Doug
While I agree with your statements regarding 316SS and its ability to withstand temperature effects, I think you or I have misinterpreted the situation. I took the description to mean that the combustion zone of the thermal oxidizer operated at the specified temperature. I picture the flame arrestor being in the waste (which I assume to be like a fuel) line. It should not experience the maximum temperatures, but should be essentially cooled by a flow of waste gases across it. Perhaps infrequently there could be a tendency for the combustion zone to flash back towards the waste gas source, and the flame arrestor would serve its function at those times. Thus it should operate at much lower temperatures than those of the combustion zone. Let me know if you think I've misinterpreted the situation.
Thanks,
Doug
#5
Posted 11 November 2005 - 03:43 PM
Yes, I misinterpreted and thanks for the comments.
Well, I first must say that I am not an expert in these matters. From the photo, it certainly appears that the elements and frame were exposed to high temperatures. I am assuming that the physical evidence would lead to the same conclusion.
If so, and the elements are melted from heat, and considering the information that I presented on the metals physical props is not the question then how did it get so hot? Did the FA function properly under those circumstances? Was it the proper selection for the application? Were the elements 316?
At this point I am injecting more questions; no answers.
What to others have to say about this?
PAUL
Well, I first must say that I am not an expert in these matters. From the photo, it certainly appears that the elements and frame were exposed to high temperatures. I am assuming that the physical evidence would lead to the same conclusion.
If so, and the elements are melted from heat, and considering the information that I presented on the metals physical props is not the question then how did it get so hot? Did the FA function properly under those circumstances? Was it the proper selection for the application? Were the elements 316?
At this point I am injecting more questions; no answers.
What to others have to say about this?
PAUL
Similar Topics
Psv On Ko Drum With Flame Arrestor At Flare Vent LineStarted by Guest_Tintin2024_* , 29 Oct 2024 |
|
![]() |
||
Burners Flame Monitoring System RequirementStarted by Guest_Movers_* , 23 Nov 2023 |
|
![]() |
||
Could Flame Arresters Be Neglected?Started by Guest_Soothsayer_* , 17 Apr 2021 |
|
![]() |
||
Lightning Arrestor On Vent HeadersStarted by Guest_muthukmaar_* , 30 Nov 2019 |
|
![]() |
||
Flame TemperatureStarted by Guest_Movers_* , 11 Oct 2019 |
|
![]() |