There is extensive literature available on the design of a vertical thermosiphon reboiler.
What must be the design basis for a forced circulation reboiler?
How does one go about designing a vertical forced circulation reboiler where the liquid involved is very fouling?
What must be the velocity through the tubes in case of very fouling liquids like fermented wash of a distillery?
And/OR
What must be the dirt factor?
How to determine the capacity of the pump required for the forced circuation?
Is it correct to design a forced circulation reboiler on the lines of a vertical thermosiphon reboiler by assuming very large recirculation ratio?
|

Design Of A Forced Circluation Reboiler
Started by Shashank Gujale, Dec 30 2005 02:09 AM
4 replies to this topic
Share this topic:
#1
Posted 30 December 2005 - 02:09 AM
#2
Posted 03 January 2006 - 04:50 AM
You will need to refer to specific litterature about heat exchangers. A forced circulation reboiler is easier to design than a natural thermosiphon reboiler.
The specific velocity should be quite high, say 20 ft/s in the tubes. Since you have a very fouling application, the vapor fraction should be quite low, probably less than 15%. You may consider flashing AFTER the tubes, that is heating in the heat exchanger (no phase change in the boiler itself due to the overpressure genberated by the pump) , and using a RO lowering the pressure and flashing. It may reduce fouling, in some cases. I would be concerned about fouling the RO, though.
I think that a better approach than a design based on a natural thermosiphon would be to handle the unit as a regular heat exchanger, with phase change, of course. You do not care that much about the tube pressure drop, do you?
As for the fouling factor, I cannot help you.
For the capacity of the pump, first you calculate the heat exchangers, its pressure drop and its vapor fraction. This gives the liquid flow, and then the pump(s).
I hope this helps
The specific velocity should be quite high, say 20 ft/s in the tubes. Since you have a very fouling application, the vapor fraction should be quite low, probably less than 15%. You may consider flashing AFTER the tubes, that is heating in the heat exchanger (no phase change in the boiler itself due to the overpressure genberated by the pump) , and using a RO lowering the pressure and flashing. It may reduce fouling, in some cases. I would be concerned about fouling the RO, though.
I think that a better approach than a design based on a natural thermosiphon would be to handle the unit as a regular heat exchanger, with phase change, of course. You do not care that much about the tube pressure drop, do you?
As for the fouling factor, I cannot help you.
For the capacity of the pump, first you calculate the heat exchangers, its pressure drop and its vapor fraction. This gives the liquid flow, and then the pump(s).
I hope this helps
#3
Posted 03 January 2006 - 08:16 AM
Actually this design is for a proposed reboiler to a distillation column of a distillery which is distilling a fermented wash containing 8% v/v ethyl alcohol where currently live steam is fed.
This steam gives its heat to the wash and condenses, this condensed steam adds greatly to the effluent.
To reduce the effluent it is proposed that instead of adding live steam to the column, a reboiler, with proper design must be used. Prior experience on this indicates that the reboilers choke after some time and there is no sufficient heat transfer.
Keeping this in mind the only reboiler that would suit this service is obviously a forced circulation reboiler.
If velocity through the tubes alone is kept as the basis for design, then doesnt it directly give the capacity of the pump required?
How do we calcualte exactly the vapours produced?
siretb: Pressure drop in the tube is not an issue at all! What is RO?
This steam gives its heat to the wash and condenses, this condensed steam adds greatly to the effluent.
To reduce the effluent it is proposed that instead of adding live steam to the column, a reboiler, with proper design must be used. Prior experience on this indicates that the reboilers choke after some time and there is no sufficient heat transfer.
Keeping this in mind the only reboiler that would suit this service is obviously a forced circulation reboiler.
If velocity through the tubes alone is kept as the basis for design, then doesnt it directly give the capacity of the pump required?
How do we calcualte exactly the vapours produced?
siretb: Pressure drop in the tube is not an issue at all! What is RO?
#4
Guest_Guest_*
Posted 04 January 2006 - 05:17 AM
RO stands for restricted Orifice (==diaphragm). It's just placed to add some pressure drop so that before orifice pressure is high (and mixture does not flash); after orifice pressure is reduced and mixture flashes.
Yes, keeping velocity constant, along with pressure drop defibnes the pump.
Yes, keeping velocity constant, along with pressure drop defibnes the pump.
#5
Guest_Mitra_*
Posted 05 January 2006 - 06:40 AM
For forced circulation evaporator it is usually recommended to maintain 20 to 30 times the evaporation as recirculation rate. There are many proprietory designs available for reduced fouling. One such design uses corrugated tubes which increases internal turbulence thereby reducing chances of fouling. You may use ECOFLUX tubes of HRS International for this. They would be able to give you the best solution.
Attached Files
Similar Topics
Refinery Lpg Deethanizer Column DesignStarted by Guest_Ilyes_* , 15 Feb 2025 |
|
![]() |
||
Levels For Kettle Type ReboilerStarted by Guest_RajD_* , 04 Apr 2025 |
|
![]() |
||
Alkaline Electrolytic Cell/stack Sizing/design For H2 ProductionStarted by Guest_BRS09_* , 13 Mar 2025 |
|
![]() |
||
![]() Heat Exchanger Network DesignStarted by Guest_Kakashi-01_* , 21 Feb 2025 |
|
![]() |
||
Phe As ReboilerStarted by Guest_Chemeng40_* , 20 Feb 2025 |
|
![]() |