Jump to content



Featured Articles

Check out the latest featured articles.

File Library

Check out the latest downloads available in the File Library.

New Article

Product Viscosity vs. Shear

Featured File

Vertical Tank Selection

New Blog Entry

Low Flow in Pipes- posted in Ankur's blog

Sonic Velocity Formula

compressible flow

This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
4 replies to this topic
Share this topic:
| More

#1 calgary

calgary

    Brand New Member

  • Members
  • 8 posts

Posted 15 November 2012 - 09:22 PM

Hi,

I am recently studying isothermal flow and adiabatic flow in horizontal pipe. In most fluid mechanics books, the sonic velocity is expressed as sqrt(krt), where k is specific heat ratio. Following link is one of the examples.

http://onlinelibrary...275276.app5/pdf

My question is: k should be only used in isentropic process (adiabatic reversible). But adiabatic flow in a pipe with friction is apparently irreversible process. why is k in the sonic velocity formula?

Another questions is: the adiabatic flow equation is derived in the context of ideal gas, which has z=1. but in some papers, z (not equal to 1) is in the pressure drop equation. why?

Appreciate any thoughts. thanks.

#2 Bobby Strain

Bobby Strain

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 3,529 posts

Posted 15 November 2012 - 10:11 PM

Your question is how to calculate sonic velocity. And the formula you present is correct. Pressure loss in a piping system is different for adiabatic flow and isothermal flow. In adiabatic flow, the temperature is reduced as the pressure decreases, which is not the case with isothermal flow. If you are looking at flow through a nozzle or orifice, you need to take special care to apply the right flow model, of which there are many.

Bobby

#3 calgary

calgary

    Brand New Member

  • Members
  • 8 posts

Posted 15 November 2012 - 11:07 PM

Hi Bobby,

thanks for you comments. I understand your point that isothermal and adiabatic flow are different. For isothermal flow, we can drop the k out of the sonic velocity expression since k=1 (PV=constant). For adiabatic flow with friction, my understanding is that k should not appear in any equation since k is only for adiabatic reversible process.

Best regards,
Tim

#4 paulhorth

paulhorth

    Gold Member

  • ChE Plus Subscriber
  • 396 posts

Posted 16 November 2012 - 10:39 AM

Tim,
You seem to be confusing two different problems - (1) sonic velocity, which is a property of a fluid,at a given T and P,, and (2) pressure drop in a pipe for various types of compressible flow (such as isentropic, adiabtic and isothermal). This is the point Bobby Strain is making.

The sonic velocity is a particular value regardless of the process which occurs upstream, so you don't have different formulae and different results for the sonic velocity in isothermal flow and adiabatic flow.
The sonic velocity for a given T and P is given by c = sqrt (dp/d.rho) at constant entropy for the given T and P. For a "perfect gas", that is, a gas which obeys PV = RT, this equates to c = sqrt ( k.RT) where k = Cp/Cv. Don't drop the k for isothermal flow.
For a real gas, you have to solve the equation given above, using an eqatioin of state or a process simulator.
The limiting velocity reached with compressible flow in a pipe, which will be the sonic velocity at the local conditions, will be different for adiabatic flow and for isothermal flow, because the values of T and P will be different between these processes.

Paul

#5 calgary

calgary

    Brand New Member

  • Members
  • 8 posts

Posted 17 November 2012 - 12:36 PM

Hi Paul,

Thanks for your reply. I think now i finnaly catch what you and Bobby are saying. Sound travelling in gas is another process different from the process the gas itself is expericencing. Therefore, the sonic velocity is the property of the gas, nothing to do with firctionless or frictional flow.
I want to quote a paragraph in the book"compressible fluid flow" by Michel SAAD to further clarify this item in case somebody like me has the similar question.
" The amplitude of pressure pulse(sound) is small, resulting in infinitesimal changes in fluid properties across the wave. Hence, the departure of the fluid from thermodynamic equlibrium is negligible, and the process is practically reversible......Consequently, heat interaction is negligible, and the process is seffectively adiabatic. therefore, the process is both reversible and adiabatic-that is isentropic."

Best regards,
Tim




Similar Topics