PSV calc 7-1PSV-142 Thermal To C2 Drum CheResources.pdf 12.98KB
57 downloadsFellow Engineers,
I am sizing a PSV for a thermal relief on the tube side of a Bitumen Vacuum Tower Bottoms(shell side)/Diluted Bitumen (tube side) exchanger. The Exchanger datasheet lists the thermal transfer for clean service at 101 Btu/hr-ft^2-F. There are 2 shells at 10,000 ft^2 each protected by one PSV. The LMTD is 67 F. The SG is about .83. The Industry standard guidelines would put the cubic expansion coefficient at .0004. When I calculate the same using hysis data, I get something larger at 0.0005. If I plug all of these numbers in (including the .0005 expansion coefficient), I come up with a heat load of 135,000 Btu/hr and a required relief rate of 329 USGPM. It sounds completely ridiculous to me for a thermal relief valve since normally TRVs are handled with a 1/2 x 3/4 relief valve.
Two questions:
1) Should I trust the expansion coefficient I calculated using HYSIS data or should I rely on the table from API 520 or 521 (not sure where it actually comes from). Just doing that cuts the required volume to about 250 USGPM.
2) Should I use the clean thermal transfer value if there is actually no flow on the tube side. Certainly a stagnant fluid on one side of the exchanger must reduce the heat transfer efficiency. If so, are there any rules of thumb to use by how much to reduce it.
Here's the main reason I believe I must be doing something wrong. The PSV has been in service for a long time and the initial calculated required relief rate was listed as 14 USGPM. I can't find the calc so I don't know what they did to get that number. Subsequently, another company did some flare study work for us and provided a number of 70 USGPM. I am not privy to the calculation method.
Thanks for any input.
Best Regards,
Fred
Edited by Alfreedo, 24 September 2014 - 01:13 AM.