Jump to content



Featured Articles

Check out the latest featured articles.

File Library

Check out the latest downloads available in the File Library.

New Article

Product Viscosity vs. Shear

Featured File

Vertical Tank Selection

New Blog Entry

Low Flow in Pipes- posted in Ankur's blog

Thermosyphon Reboiler Recirculation Rate

thermosyphon reboiler recirculation

This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
3 replies to this topic
Share this topic:
| More

#1 amitray

amitray

    Brand New Member

  • Inactive Member
  • Pip
  • 6 posts

Posted 17 November 2016 - 12:40 AM

Dear Sir,

 

   Can anyone kindly help me to understand why the initial recirculation ratio(Liquid to Vapor ratio) of 4 is assumed in first iteration and why not any other value. Where from the value 4 was found out. Normally I am getting 200 to 300 as circulation ratio for the thermosyphon reboiler design. I need to understand how this value 4 came.

 

Regards

Amit



#2 sgkim

sgkim

    Gold Member

  • ChE Plus Subscriber
  • 289 posts

Posted 17 November 2016 - 06:51 AM

Amitray,

 

You can refer to this same subject here:  http://www.cheresour...culation-ratio/ .

 

The liquid to vapor ratio of 4 is equal to 20% of the mass fraction vaporized from the circulating flow in your thermysyphon reboiler.  The figure 200 or 300 of recirculation ratio is equal to 0.5% or 0.33% or vapor fraction, but it may not be applicable to thermosyphon reboilers.   I myself have rule-of-thumb value range of 5 % to 30% but usually takes values typically 10% to 15% for my design purposes.   Much lower vapor fractions could be attainable for forced-circulation reboilers.    

 

I understand there would not be "a critical value" or "critical range" of vapor fractions or recirculation raios in the reboiler design.   Previous experience for the same or similar system could be a best guide.   Organic materials are subject to be degraded if exposed at high temperatures then high circulation ratio with low vapor fraction shall be applied to minimize the contact time on the heating tube.   Higher vapor rate at higher heat flux provide good driving force for the circulation. But higher vapor rate (lower circulation ratio) often makes 'film boiling" in the tube, which will substantially decrease overall heat transfer coefficient and bring unexpected severe fouling problems too.   Based on an 'adequate' vapor fraction or recirculation ratio from the previous experience,  two-phase hydraulic analysis shall be done properly for the circulation loop.          

 

A general guide for typical heat fluxes can be used as a cross reference:  file:///D:/%EB%B0%94%ED%83%95%20%ED%99%94%EB%A9%B4/%EA%B3%A4%EC%A4%84%EB%B0%95%EC%9D%B4/Understanding_Heat_Flux_Limitations_CCTI_2010.pdf

 

~Stefano



#3 breizh

breizh

    Gold Member

  • Admin
  • 6,715 posts

Posted 17 November 2016 - 07:43 PM

Hi ,

Consider reading these documents .

Hope this helps.you and others.

Pierre



#4 Pilesar

Pilesar

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 1,555 posts

Posted 18 November 2016 - 10:45 AM

The thermosiphon reboiler must generate enough vapor to circulate the fluid. But too much vapor leads to the drying out the heat transfer surface which stops the boiling. The initial recirculation ratio of 4 is often set as a target for a reasonable amount of vaporization in a circulating reboiler. The vaporization rate is a result of the boiling range of the fluid, the equipment selected and the piping configuration. Because you asked the question, I suspect you can reduce the size of your piping and equipment significantly by optimizing your exchanger design. If your initial design iteration has a 300 circulation ratio that theoretically works, consider it a challenge to reduce the exchanger and piping sizes for better performance and less expense.






Similar Topics