we have many cases in our plants of installation indirect heaters in trunk lines and at oil processing plants inlet. the supplier of indirect heaters sometimes supplied it with thermal expansion safety relief . i want to know when this safety relief is mandatory to install and when it is not mandatory because some other suppliers supplied indirect heaters without this PSV. and what the reference for install or not install that PSV?
thanks very much
|


Thermal Expansion Safety Relief Valve
#1
Posted 30 November 2018 - 03:14 AM
#2
Posted 30 November 2018 - 03:31 AM
Mido:
In general when the fluid being heated is blocked in and the heating fluid is still flowing...
#3
Posted 30 November 2018 - 03:41 AM
Edited by Chemitofreak, 30 November 2018 - 03:45 AM.
#4
Posted 01 December 2018 - 03:26 AM
Thanks for reply but my concern is about the need of safety relief if if the indirect heater have only manual isolation valves and not have automated shutdowns ...... can we remove this psv and control this hazard by administrative control that (in case of heater isolated to drain it). as this project is upgrade to existing system and to connect PSV to flare is not feasible.
#5
Posted 01 December 2018 - 05:36 AM
Thanks for reply but my concern is about the need of safety relief if if the indirect heater have only manual isolation valves and not have automated shutdowns ...... can we remove this psv and control this hazard by administrative control that (in case of heater isolated to drain it). as this project is upgrade to existing system and to connect PSV to flare is not feasible.
In general, administrative control cannot be used instead of a PSV for overpressure relief...
#6
Posted 19 March 2019 - 09:51 AM
Hello, interesting this topic reagrding on the volumne of the fluis that it is blocked; but actually, I´ve never found volume criteria of the fluid that is trapped? FOoinstance, if the volume is higher than 50 liters, do I hace to install a TRV, no matter the classification of the fluid is ? ( inflamable, or toxic, etc ). This criteria shall be applied in interconnecting lines outside of batttery limit or tanckage areas, but actually I do not know the volume or pipe lenght to be applied...Does anyone has heard about criteria for this? thanks
#7
Posted 22 March 2019 - 02:17 AM
@ Asantosa:
It can vary from company to company. In our company it is considered as 500 Liters
#8
Posted 22 March 2019 - 04:00 AM
#9
Posted 22 March 2019 - 06:38 AM
Great thread! Mr. Art has given excellent point in choosing ball/ plug valve with self venting hole.
Similar Topics
Safety Internship OpportunityStarted by Guest_Roadsters_* , 24 Apr 2025 |
|
![]() |
||
Check Valve FailureStarted by Guest_Falah_* , 26 Mar 2025 |
|
![]() |
||
Multiport Selector Valve (Msv)Started by Guest__1angelia23_* , 12 Mar 2025 |
|
![]() |
||
![]() Valve Cavity - Pressure Relief ValveStarted by Guest_CS10_* , 20 Feb 2025 |
|
![]() |
||
Improving Safety By Re-Routing Priming Vent Line In Centrifugal Pump HStarted by Guest_Srinivas Agastheeswaran_* , 31 Jan 2025 |
|
![]() |