In the DHDT the pump 507-P-009 is useless and could be removed, including its FC and FCV, and the LC on chimney tray #7.
Such pump would only make sense if the liquid from stage #7 would have to pass through a distributor with a considerable pressure drop, such as a spray nozzle, to reach stage #6. Maybe in the beginning of the design it was considered to have packing for stages 1 thru 6 but as it looks now on the PFD there are simply 6 trays. You could verify that with the P&ID and fractionator detailed drawing. Note also NOTE 2 on the drawing.
In the VGOHDT it is not clear from the PFD from which tray number the pump gets its liquid. One would expect from the unnumbered chimney tray, but the LC is shown to be located much higher. Check with P&ID and fractionator drawing.
Again: as the stages below the pump discharge seem to be trays #1 thru #12, not packing with a spray distributor, the pump is useless and could be removed, including its FC and FCV and the LC on the chimney tray.
Sometimes a final design looks stupid because of philosophy changes during the design phase. Nowadays more often designs are stupid because the designers are not very smart. In the old days designs were made by experienced engineers with not only experience but also insight. Nowadays those old guys are retired and designs are done by young engineers that happen to be able to run a process simulator. They often have little or no insight or understanding of the process and unit operations (such as fractionation).
Nothing surprises me anymore, not even if it comes from a reputable licensor like Axens.
You could contact Axens and ask them why they designed it as it is. However you will probably get a BS answer as they are not likely to admit that the design is not optimal.
Edited by PingPong, 11 April 2020 - 06:26 AM.