|

Ram Studies - Interpretation Of Oreda Data
Started by Steve McGahey, Jul 02 2008 04:35 AM
8 replies to this topic
Share this topic:
#1
Posted 02 July 2008 - 04:35 AM
I often hear questions about the interpretation of OREDA data for RAM (Reliability, Availability, Maintenance) Studies, because there are no clear guidelines on what should be considered.
Well, I've long had my own opinions on the answers to these questions; answers formed from some of the training courses I've been on (where people sometimes have different opinions) and also from my experience and specific questions I've asked while working on projects.
I'm going to summarise a few of these here, in the hope of helping people with similar questions, and/or also in the hope of prompting some discussion on the subject.
For now, I'm just going to say that all of the failure mode distributions used in OREDA are exponential, and that the repair times are based on a smattering of data with no real distribution... so it can be argued that repair times should be modelled as constant, or rectangular distributions.
More to come, including a blurred-out (to protect OREDA's copyright) labelled picture of a typical OREDA data page, and some notes on the different elements on that page.
- Steve
Well, I've long had my own opinions on the answers to these questions; answers formed from some of the training courses I've been on (where people sometimes have different opinions) and also from my experience and specific questions I've asked while working on projects.
I'm going to summarise a few of these here, in the hope of helping people with similar questions, and/or also in the hope of prompting some discussion on the subject.
For now, I'm just going to say that all of the failure mode distributions used in OREDA are exponential, and that the repair times are based on a smattering of data with no real distribution... so it can be argued that repair times should be modelled as constant, or rectangular distributions.
More to come, including a blurred-out (to protect OREDA's copyright) labelled picture of a typical OREDA data page, and some notes on the different elements on that page.
- Steve
#2
Posted 02 July 2008 - 07:34 AM
Steve,
Sounds interesting to me. I am looking forward to your posts!
Sounds interesting to me. I am looking forward to your posts!
#3
Posted 21 July 2008 - 09:14 AM
QUOTE (Steve McGahey @ Jul 2 2008, 10:35 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
More to come, including a blurred-out (to protect OREDA's copyright) labelled picture of a typical OREDA data page, and some notes on the different elements on that page.
- Steve
- Steve
Well, here are the attachments. That's all, for now. Might come back if there are any questions.


#4
Posted 21 July 2008 - 09:21 AM
Steve,
The picture of the OREDA page is quite vague. Is it possible to put a higher quality picture in the Word document?
The picture of the OREDA page is quite vague. Is it possible to put a higher quality picture in the Word document?
#5
Posted 22 July 2008 - 06:18 AM
QUOTE (gvdlans @ Jul 21 2008, 03:21 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Steve,
The picture of the OREDA page is quite vague. Is it possible to put a higher quality picture in the Word document?
The picture of the OREDA page is quite vague. Is it possible to put a higher quality picture in the Word document?
Unfortunately, no - I have made the picture vague by design, not by accident. I am worried about being accused of publishing parts of an expensive database, which is why I've blurred the numbers.
If you can suggest a way around this problem, then I'm happy to help.
#6
Posted 22 July 2008 - 06:29 AM
I've seen people asking how to convert OREDA data into a Weibull distribution (Wiki: Weibull Distrbutions).
Well, the OREDA data follows an exponential distribution, which is a Weibull distribution with a shape factor (k) of 1.
So, assume that the shape factor is 1.
The characteristic life remains the same.
There's your answer.
Well, the OREDA data follows an exponential distribution, which is a Weibull distribution with a shape factor (k) of 1.
So, assume that the shape factor is 1.
The characteristic life remains the same.
There's your answer.
#7
Posted 22 July 2008 - 06:29 AM
Ah OK, now I understand why the red numbers were sharp while the black numbers were vague.
Maybe you can make your own table of a hypothetical piece of equipment?
Maybe you can make your own table of a hypothetical piece of equipment?
#8
Posted 22 July 2008 - 09:24 AM
QUOTE (gvdlans @ Jul 22 2008, 12:29 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Ah OK, now I understand why the red numbers were sharp while the black numbers were vague.
Maybe you can make your own table of a hypothetical piece of equipment?
Maybe you can make your own table of a hypothetical piece of equipment?
Are you really keen to see this? I'll do it if you are, but not otherwise.
#9
Posted 22 July 2008 - 09:47 AM
No, it is OK. Thank you for the effort!
Similar Topics
Gpsa Engineering Data Book 14 Th Pdf .Started by Guest_guoyinyanliner_* , 03 Apr 2025 |
|
![]() |
||
Co2 And Mea Vle DataStarted by Guest_Verdurer_* , 24 Mar 2025 |
|
![]() |
||
![]() Equilibrium Data For Nitric Acid And WaterStarted by Guest_ksagarzazu_* , 07 Oct 2024 |
|
![]() |
||
Help Using The Data Fits Tool In Aspen HysysStarted by Guest_catia_* , 14 Jun 2024 |
|
![]() |
||
Aspen Edr Error Data BaseStarted by Guest_adrich91_* , 31 Jan 2024 |
|
![]() |