Jump to content



Featured Articles

Check out the latest featured articles.

File Library

Check out the latest downloads available in the File Library.

New Article

Product Viscosity vs. Shear

Featured File

Vertical Tank Selection

New Blog Entry

Low Flow in Pipes- posted in Ankur's blog

Ram Studies - Interpretation Of Oreda Data


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
8 replies to this topic
Share this topic:
| More

#1 Steve McGahey

Steve McGahey

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 73 posts

Posted 02 July 2008 - 04:35 AM

I often hear questions about the interpretation of OREDA data for RAM (Reliability, Availability, Maintenance) Studies, because there are no clear guidelines on what should be considered.

Well, I've long had my own opinions on the answers to these questions; answers formed from some of the training courses I've been on (where people sometimes have different opinions) and also from my experience and specific questions I've asked while working on projects.

I'm going to summarise a few of these here, in the hope of helping people with similar questions, and/or also in the hope of prompting some discussion on the subject.

For now, I'm just going to say that all of the failure mode distributions used in OREDA are exponential, and that the repair times are based on a smattering of data with no real distribution... so it can be argued that repair times should be modelled as constant, or rectangular distributions.

More to come, including a blurred-out (to protect OREDA's copyright) labelled picture of a typical OREDA data page, and some notes on the different elements on that page.

- Steve

#2 gvdlans

gvdlans

    Gold Member

  • ChE Plus Subscriber
  • 619 posts

Posted 02 July 2008 - 07:34 AM

Steve,

Sounds interesting to me. I am looking forward to your posts!

#3 Steve McGahey

Steve McGahey

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 73 posts

Posted 21 July 2008 - 09:14 AM

QUOTE (Steve McGahey @ Jul 2 2008, 10:35 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
More to come, including a blurred-out (to protect OREDA's copyright) labelled picture of a typical OREDA data page, and some notes on the different elements on that page.

- Steve


Well, here are the attachments. That's all, for now. Might come back if there are any questions.

Attached File  Example_OREDA_page.png   122.67KB   142 downloads

Attached File  Explanation_of_OREDA_database.doc   28.5KB   171 downloads

#4 gvdlans

gvdlans

    Gold Member

  • ChE Plus Subscriber
  • 619 posts

Posted 21 July 2008 - 09:21 AM

Steve,

The picture of the OREDA page is quite vague. Is it possible to put a higher quality picture in the Word document?

#5 Steve McGahey

Steve McGahey

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 73 posts

Posted 22 July 2008 - 06:18 AM

QUOTE (gvdlans @ Jul 21 2008, 03:21 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Steve,

The picture of the OREDA page is quite vague. Is it possible to put a higher quality picture in the Word document?


Unfortunately, no - I have made the picture vague by design, not by accident. I am worried about being accused of publishing parts of an expensive database, which is why I've blurred the numbers.

If you can suggest a way around this problem, then I'm happy to help.

#6 Steve McGahey

Steve McGahey

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 73 posts

Posted 22 July 2008 - 06:29 AM

I've seen people asking how to convert OREDA data into a Weibull distribution (Wiki: Weibull Distrbutions).

Well, the OREDA data follows an exponential distribution, which is a Weibull distribution with a shape factor (k) of 1.

So, assume that the shape factor is 1.
The characteristic life remains the same.

There's your answer.

#7 gvdlans

gvdlans

    Gold Member

  • ChE Plus Subscriber
  • 619 posts

Posted 22 July 2008 - 06:29 AM

Ah OK, now I understand why the red numbers were sharp while the black numbers were vague.

Maybe you can make your own table of a hypothetical piece of equipment?

#8 Steve McGahey

Steve McGahey

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 73 posts

Posted 22 July 2008 - 09:24 AM

QUOTE (gvdlans @ Jul 22 2008, 12:29 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Ah OK, now I understand why the red numbers were sharp while the black numbers were vague.

Maybe you can make your own table of a hypothetical piece of equipment?


Are you really keen to see this? I'll do it if you are, but not otherwise.

#9 gvdlans

gvdlans

    Gold Member

  • ChE Plus Subscriber
  • 619 posts

Posted 22 July 2008 - 09:47 AM

No, it is OK. Thank you for the effort!




Similar Topics