Jump to content



Featured Articles

Check out the latest featured articles.

File Library

Check out the latest downloads available in the File Library.

New Article

Product Viscosity vs. Shear

Featured File

Vertical Tank Selection

New Blog Entry

Low Flow in Pipes- posted in Ankur's blog

Old Pipe Roughness


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
4 replies to this topic
Share this topic:
| More

#1 Carlos Massucci

Carlos Massucci

    Brand New Member

  • Members
  • 1 posts

Posted 15 January 2009 - 06:55 AM

Hello

I'm doing a pressure drop calculation and I cant find the roughness for used (or old) commercial steel.
I need the old data because the factory is old.

Does anyone know a good souce?

And I need references. So internet isn´t so trustful.

Thank all.

#2 Art Montemayor

Art Montemayor

    Gold Member

  • Admin
  • 5,782 posts

Posted 15 January 2009 - 07:42 AM


Carlos:

Since we don’t know the scope of work under which you are doing your pressure drop calculations, it is rather difficult to recommend any one pipe roughness we believe would “fit the bill” – or be appropriate for what you are doing.

Although you don’t state it outright, what we are discussing here is the actual, existing, absolute pipe roughness of the internal surface of a pipe. The reported measurements for pipe roughness in such acknowledged and recognized expert publications such as Crane’s Tech Paper #410 state the following values for absolute roughness (in feet):

Drawn tubing = 0.000005
Commercial Carbon steel = 0.00015
Asphalted Cast Iron = 0.0004
Galvanized Iron = 0.0005
Cast Iron = 0.00085
Concrete = 0.001 to 0.01

Crane does not specify the age or condition of the materials. I have always assumed the above values are for NEW material. However, Crane (and the ASME report by L.F. Moody, where this data originated) is about as good a reference as you can get.

Please be aware that the above values represent a “best effort” in measuring representative samples and the measurements are random and represent an “average”. The measurements are also subject to an unreported error (which is expected). I have always used the above values with a 25% contingency added to them. In other words, I multiply them by 1.25. And that is for NEW material. For older, rusted, worn, eroded, or contaminated material I always add another contingency – depending on the circumstances, the scope of work, and the need for being conservative in design.

No one in his/her right mind expects you to be accurate in estimating the absolute roughness existing inside a pipe that no one can actually see – or accurately measure. The actual, existing absolute roughness of any pipe IS and ALWAYS WILL BE an estimate based on the engineer’s experience and knowledge of the process in question. That’s as much as anyone can hope for. Fortunately, real-life calculations and applications prove the method to be acceptable within good engineering judgment – as long as the calculations take into consideration the application of the results and the need (or lack of need) to be conservative.


#3 ankur2061

ankur2061

    Gold Member

  • Forum Moderator
  • 2,484 posts

Posted 15 January 2009 - 09:23 AM

Carlos,

Look in section 6.1 of Norsok P-001 edition 5. The free download link is:

http://www.standard....er.exe?id=13264

The value given for carbon steel (corroded) is 0.5 mm. Seems fairly conservative but it is from a respected reference.

Regards,
Ankur.

#4 JoeWong

JoeWong

    Gold Member

  • ChE Plus Subscriber
  • 1,223 posts

Posted 15 January 2009 - 12:26 PM


It really subject to corrosivity of fluid, type of material, maintenance activitity, life of the pipe, etc.

Is this a real plant ? You may consider to re-establish roughness value from actual flow condition (if you can).

#5 sheiko

sheiko

    Gold Member

  • ChE Plus Subscriber
  • 732 posts

Posted 15 January 2009 - 03:00 PM

See attachment

Attached Files






Similar Topics