Posted 19 March 2009 - 06:50 PM
Judging by the size of the bypass line i'd say this is probably an example of hot-vapour bypass.
For the sake of argument imagine the pressure at the split between the line to the condenser is 10 Bar, the bypass line could then (again plucking reasonable numbers) have a pressure drop across the CV of 0.3 bar and across the rest of the line 0.05 bar (in any case you'll want to have the majority across the CV to get a more stable process). Therefore the pressure of the reflux drum would be 9.65 bar.
As we can see we now have a differential pressure between the tie-in to the bypass line and the reflux drum itself. Now let us move along the main route to the condenser, imagine we have a pressure drop across the condenser of 0.15 bar, this leaves us another 0.2 bar to get to the reflux drum (ignoring line loss's for the sake of simplicity). This 0.2 bar is what we lose in terms of static head.
If column pressure goes up then the control valve will close, raising liquid level in the drum and exposing more tubes in the condenser ==> higher duty. Conversely if the column pressure drops the control valve will open, forcing down liquid level in the drum and conversely submerging more tubes in the condenser ==> more sub-cooling and less condensing.
This is as noted, a tricky system to design. The condenser itself must be designed for sub-cooling else the liquid will flash as the pressure drops. If we get the elevation of the drum too high then there is a chance that there is not enough sub-cooling and the inlet pipe may choke. If the elevation of the drum is too low then there will not be enough pressure drop across the bypass line to control the process adequately.
As you note you have a 10MW condenser, I expect this to be fairly large, therefore for ease of maintenance, construction etc. it is easier to mount it at grade.
Now a question for you, does this drum have insulation?