Dear all,
In some articles, foaming factor 0.8 is used for a new depropanizer design. Is it too low for existing depropanizer rating? How about 0.9 or 1.0 (non-foaming)?
Any good suggestion?
Many Thanks
|

Foaming Factor Selection
Started by dave2001, Feb 22 2010 09:19 AM
2 replies to this topic
Share this topic:
#1
Posted 22 February 2010 - 09:19 AM
#2
Posted 22 February 2010 - 10:26 AM
System factor of 0.8 sounds too pesimistic for a depropanizer tower - more likely it is closer to 0.95 and assuming moderate pressures (<15 bar). Stanley Walas in his book "Chemical process equipment" classifies hydrocarbon fractionators into non-foaming systems (SF=1) while systems with SF==0.85 belong to moderate foaming category (e.g. oil absorbers, amine and glycol regenerators etc.)
Attached is the reference table from GPSA Databook.
Attached is the reference table from GPSA Databook.
Attached Files
#3
Posted 23 February 2010 - 08:59 AM
Thanks, It may helpful.
Similar Topics
![]() Activated Carbon SelectionStarted by Guest_Talhafarooq_* , 25 Nov 2024 |
|
![]() |
||
![]() Colebrook's Equation - Friction FactorStarted by Guest_breizh_* , 10 Nov 2024 |
|
![]() |
||
C Factor For Erosional Velocity For Multi-Phase Flow (Nat Gas/ ProduceStarted by Guest_Sam11_* , 10 Sep 2024 |
|
![]() |
||
![]() Determining The F-Factor Following The Api 2000Started by Guest_Hachimi_* , 06 Sep 2024 |
|
![]() |
||
![]() Environmental Factor "f" Calculation In Psv Fire CaseStarted by Guest_mahmooddalvi09_* , 17 Aug 2024 |
|
![]() |