Jump to content



Featured Articles

Check out the latest featured articles.

File Library

Check out the latest downloads available in the File Library.

New Article

Product Viscosity vs. Shear

Featured File

Vertical Tank Selection

New Blog Entry

Low Flow in Pipes- posted in Ankur's blog

Foaming Factor Selection


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
2 replies to this topic
Share this topic:
| More

#1 dave2001

dave2001

    Brand New Member

  • Members
  • 9 posts

Posted 22 February 2010 - 09:19 AM

Dear all,

In some articles, foaming factor 0.8 is used for a new depropanizer design. Is it too low for existing depropanizer rating? How about 0.9 or 1.0 (non-foaming)?

Any good suggestion?

Many Thanks

#2 Zauberberg

Zauberberg

    Gold Member

  • ChE Plus Subscriber
  • 2,728 posts

Posted 22 February 2010 - 10:26 AM

System factor of 0.8 sounds too pesimistic for a depropanizer tower - more likely it is closer to 0.95 and assuming moderate pressures (<15 bar). Stanley Walas in his book "Chemical process equipment" classifies hydrocarbon fractionators into non-foaming systems (SF=1) while systems with SF==0.85 belong to moderate foaming category (e.g. oil absorbers, amine and glycol regenerators etc.)

Attached is the reference table from GPSA Databook.

Attached Files



#3 dave2001

dave2001

    Brand New Member

  • Members
  • 9 posts

Posted 23 February 2010 - 08:59 AM

Thanks, It may helpful.




Similar Topics